1. Describe the decision
Use the prepared example or describe your own situation. Explain what needs to be decided and what the case covers.
Method
Describe the decision, add the available information and examine the analysis. Rabbit prepares a recommendation; the authorised person decides what to do.
Try the pilot in three steps
Use the prepared example or describe your own situation. Explain what needs to be decided and what the case covers.
Upload the available records and provide relevant details. Run the analysis and review its questions, gaps, options and recommendation.
Check what supports the recommendation. Tell us what helps, what is missing and where you disagree. The decision remains yours, within your authority.
A fictional construction example
The drawing specifies an FD60S doorset, but the supplier offers an immediately available FD30S doorset. The opening measurement is unconfirmed, and the Project Manager has put the order on hold until the requirements are clarified.
The case brings together a drawing extract, a supplier quote, a survey note and team messages. The review asks whether Rabbit identifies the conflicting specifications, the missing confirmations and who has authority to allow work to proceed.
This describes the task in a synthetic test pack. It does not present a completed analysis or a pilot result.
The method
Clarify the objective, decision to be made, boundaries, roles and authority. Record the available material and where it came from.
Separate supported facts from assumptions, opinions and unknowns. Surface gaps, conflicting accounts and dependencies that could change the answer.
Consider the material effect on scope, time, commercial or financial position, and other relevant risks. Avoid false precision where evidence is weak.
Compare options, expose trade-offs and prepare a recommendation or a decision request. A human with the right authority makes and records the decision.
Does Rabbit ask useful questions, make uncertainty clear and prepare an analysis you can examine? We welcome feedback on both the reasoning and the experience of using the pilot.
See the report from a separate fictional facade case